The Opposition spokesman on Justice, A.J. Nicholson, QC, issued a press release today in response to an earlier news report that the position of Solicitor General is to be advertised in two weeks. I already commented on this in a previous post. Mr. Nicholson was interviewed on RJR on "Beyond the Headlines". I was interviewed on the same programme shortly after Mr. Nicholson. It doesn't often happen, but this time, I entirely agree with the sentiments of Mr. Nicholson, as reflected in his press release, which I reproduce below.
NEWS RELEASE
The reported proposal for the position of Solicitor General to be advertised for a new functionary to be appointed threatens to move Jamaica into that group of countries where the provisions of their constitution – the basic law- may be flouted to meet the wishes of the leader of government.
The peoples of those countries have collectively come to rue the day that they first allowed that kind of incursion to take place.
It is not an easy road to turn back from, once it has been taken.
The Jamaican Constitution obliges the governor general to appoint a solicitor general when a recommendation is made to him by the Public Service Commission.
A properly constituted Commission made such a recommendation to the governor general, which for several months he has failed to act upon, in clear breach of the Constitution. This is obviously on the directive of the prime minister, the head of government, again in breach of the Constitution.
The governor general dismissed that Commission, on the directive of the prime minister. The legitimacy of that dismissal remains to be decided by the Supreme Court of Jamaica.
The prime minister then proceeded to have another Public Service Commission appointed, in a manner that clearly brushed aside the process which was negotiated and agreed upon in the Vale Royal Talks. So, the prime minister now has in place a Commission with four of its membership of five, selected directly by him, to recommend the appointment of a solicitor general, who must then be anointed by him, with a compliant governor general standing by.
Other such appointments will undoubtedly be made in the same manner to fill positions in the public service. The prime minister will then effectively be in control of the public service.
If we the people of Jamaica allow this to pass, we will come to rue our inaction. This is inimical to the workings of the system of Westminster style democracy, to which Jamaica and its people still subscribe. It would mark the beginnings of dictatorial rule.
Contact : A.J Nicholson
Opposition Spokesman on Justice
Tel : 941-1209
Date : January 22, 2008
Welcome to my blog
The rule of law in Jamaica is under serious threat, following the government's opposition to the appointment of Stephen Vasciannie as Solicitor General of Jamaica, and its subsequent dismissal of the Public Service Commission for alleged "misbehaviour".
Under Jamaica's constitution, the Public Service Commission has the exclusive authority to select persons for appointment to positions in Jamaica's civil service. The Solicitor General is one such position. The Solicitor General has overall administrative responsibility for the running of the Attorney General's Department. The Attorney General is appointed directly by the Prime Minister, and is therefore a political appointee.
In October 2007, Stephen Vasciannie was selected by the PSC for appointment as Jamaica's next Solicitor General. Contrary to Jamaica's constitution, Prime Minister Bruce Golding opposed the selection of Stephen Vasciannie as Jamaica's next Solicitor General. When the PSC refused to back down from its recommendation of Stephen Vasciannie, the PM dismissed the members in mid-December 2007. The Prime Minister claimed that he was dismissing the PSC members for "misbehaviour". Dismissal for "misbehaviour" is possible under Jamaica's constitution. However, the grounds of misbehaviour cited by the PM appear at best to be tenuous, and at worse, a cynical attempt to corrupt the autonomy of the PSC. The dismissal of the PSC has been challenged in the Jamaican courts by the Leader of the Opposition. I note with satisfaction that four of the five PSC members filed suit against the Prime Minister at the end of January 2008. Unfortunately, full trial is not scheduled until December 2008, primarily, if not solely, at the behest of the lawyers representing the AG and PM. In this respect, I do believe that the judiciary has dropped the ball in allowing the hearing to be deferred for so long.
[Editorial note-December 08, 2008- the litigation has now been settled]
I will post a number of news paper stories and articles that have been published on this issue, as well as other relevant information, such as the constitutional provisions that govern the PSC. I will also offer commentary from time to time on developments as they arise.
Most importantly, I do hope that interested Jamaicans and others will use this blog as a forum for the exchange of information and views. Needless to say, disagreement is more than welcome, but not disrespect.
Under Jamaica's constitution, the Public Service Commission has the exclusive authority to select persons for appointment to positions in Jamaica's civil service. The Solicitor General is one such position. The Solicitor General has overall administrative responsibility for the running of the Attorney General's Department. The Attorney General is appointed directly by the Prime Minister, and is therefore a political appointee.
In October 2007, Stephen Vasciannie was selected by the PSC for appointment as Jamaica's next Solicitor General. Contrary to Jamaica's constitution, Prime Minister Bruce Golding opposed the selection of Stephen Vasciannie as Jamaica's next Solicitor General. When the PSC refused to back down from its recommendation of Stephen Vasciannie, the PM dismissed the members in mid-December 2007. The Prime Minister claimed that he was dismissing the PSC members for "misbehaviour". Dismissal for "misbehaviour" is possible under Jamaica's constitution. However, the grounds of misbehaviour cited by the PM appear at best to be tenuous, and at worse, a cynical attempt to corrupt the autonomy of the PSC. The dismissal of the PSC has been challenged in the Jamaican courts by the Leader of the Opposition. I note with satisfaction that four of the five PSC members filed suit against the Prime Minister at the end of January 2008. Unfortunately, full trial is not scheduled until December 2008, primarily, if not solely, at the behest of the lawyers representing the AG and PM. In this respect, I do believe that the judiciary has dropped the ball in allowing the hearing to be deferred for so long.
[Editorial note-December 08, 2008- the litigation has now been settled]
I will post a number of news paper stories and articles that have been published on this issue, as well as other relevant information, such as the constitutional provisions that govern the PSC. I will also offer commentary from time to time on developments as they arise.
Most importantly, I do hope that interested Jamaicans and others will use this blog as a forum for the exchange of information and views. Needless to say, disagreement is more than welcome, but not disrespect.
Tuesday, January 22, 2008
Press release by A. J. Nicholson, QC on reported plan to advertise post of Solicitor General
Posted by
Hilaire Sobers
at
10:12 PM
Labels: Commentary, news report, Public Service Commission, Solicitor General
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment